[Routing] generalized routing format
Tristram Gräbener
tristramg at gmail.com
Mon Oct 20 13:28:02 BST 2008
Hello,
After some thoughts, I think that what I would need, is only the
current xml files, where there is a constraint that each way may be
only made of nodes of degree 2 (except at start and end). Of course I
guess that there is no way to change the API ;)
Wouldn't be it easy to make that as the exchange format, e.g. by
adding a Link property made of nodes ? Of course this would break the
normal form as it would be redundant to ways.
A universal binary format with some API would be nice for people that
want to play with graph algorithms (like students) but I personnaly
have no use for that (yet).
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Philip Homburg
<pch-osm-routing at u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> In your letter dated Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:45:46 +0200 you wrote:
>>Marcus Wolschon wrote:
>>> I think it would be better to discuss basic
>>> storage and indexes first before going on
>>> about special optimizations.
>>>
>>I agree with that.
>>Is there some lowest common denominator for a generalized routing format?
>>Something everyone could use / need who works on routing osm data?
>>There is a nice visual description by Michael Josenhans in the wiki
>>http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OSM_Routing_Data_Layer
>>As a first step merge the intermediate nodes of degree two?
>>Is this simple enough to fit everyone?
>
> One thing worth considering for routing (not for displaying a moving map)
> is the use of a line graph (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_graph).
> That should make it possible to represent turn restrictions directly in the
> graph. And it also provides easy support for different costs of crossing
> an intersection (a left turn compared to a right turn).
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Routing mailing list
> Routing at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/routing
>
More information about the Routing
mailing list