[Routing] comparison of navigation-apps

Eddy Petrișor eddy.petrisor at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 15:18:51 GMT 2009


2009/3/20 Marcus Wolschon <Marcus at wolschon.biz>:
> Eddy Petrișor schrieb:
>>> I don't suspect we get enough information to get more then just
>>> the major applications into the table at all. Anyway we will have many
>>
>> The way the table is arranged now, it even discourages possible new
>> applications to be added.
>>
>>> more features then applications. This the table would grow terribly wide.
>>
>> I think this layout is better:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Software
>
> That table has very short headings.
> What can we do about the explanations for each heading we have?

Place them above each table.

> I guess the grouping of headers can be done using 2 header-rows and
> colspans.
> We`ll see how it looks when you`re done, ok? :)

I made a mock-up (not all tables are transformed):
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing/Talk:OfflineRouters

-- 
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein




More information about the Routing mailing list