[Routing] Fixing routing with tags
OSM
osm at bavarianmallet.de
Wed Dec 13 16:25:11 UTC 2023
Hi
Am 12.12.2023 um 19:01 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 09:16:13PM +0000, Dave F via Routing wrote:
>> HI
>> Could you clarify why you "don't want to use this this road as a through
>> road, even though it's legally allowed "
> Just a road that is physically incapable of taking all the through
> traffic by dimensions, lanes etc.
Well ... in fact I doubt that there is really such amount of through
traffic in this direction (to be verified).
But it really may be a problem, if heavy goods traffic is routed this way.
If this way would be a public accessible "Fahrweg" between dense
"Knicks" (rural wild hedges) like here in rural Schleswig-Holstein -
e.g. like a track with only concrete lanes and gras/sand in the middle -
I would not hesitate to map it as track - as a track still can be public
accessible!
But here it seams to be an asphalt way with a notable width ...
I still would think about to map it as track (type_1) ... or as service
may be ...
I know there will be many "No! - it is a PUBLIC STREET!" - well feel
free to drive it then ... in particular with a 40-tons ... 😉
Georg
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft.
www.avg.com
More information about the Routing
mailing list