[Strategic] Please document

[TimSC]

Mikel, and all,

I actually think there are other unexplored issues which have not 
raised, since I wanted to try to find some common ground in our 
discussion (hard to believe, I know). It is slightly premature to say we 
have definitively exhausted the discussion. I agree that we can start 
documenting things and I have started a wiki page. I have written the 
background section with information is intended to be our common agreed 
ground of (mostly) factual information. If people can have a look and 
anything in the background that you think is controversial can be moved 
out of that section. Feel free to add additional factual information 
that won't cause objections and is relevant to the discussion. That way 
we can avoid going over the same ground again and again.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forking

I also suggest we put this on osm-talk in a few days, but you can have a 
first shot at it. (Jim, I'll probably reply off list regarding your post 
at some point.)

TimSC

PS Please keep legal talk on the appropriate mailing list.
PPS I'm off to do some mapping...

On 31/08/10 04:32, Mikel Maron wrote:
> Guys
> The Fork discussion has been pretty exhausted. We understand the 
> points of view.
> If someone can document off-list the points of view, in a neutral way, 
> that would be a positive contribution.
> Otherwise we're treading water.
> Thanks
> Mikel
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/strategic/attachments/20100831/67134931/attachment.html>