[Strategic] Featured routing services
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Fri Mar 4 08:52:27 GMT 2011
Eugene,
On 03/04/11 09:43, Eugene Usvitsky wrote:
> I believe we should discuss 2 different questions:
> - which service should be used for website
> - which service should be used for internal data quality checks?
Maybe the first question to discuss is whether routing is desired at all.
> My documents give answer only to the first question. In my opinion,
> MapQuest routing engine is the most feature-rich among all commercial
> and non-commercial. We can't (or better shouldn't) use several routing
> engines for website because it will confuse its users, so our choice
> is MapQuest API.
Personally I would not use an external routing service on our web site.
If someone wants to use MapQuest's routing engine, then why not go to
open.mapquest.com where it is readily available?
> Currently I am interested in something
> different - do we really need routing for data quality? As far as I
> understand, routing can check 2 things:
OSM thrives on the "unexpected" uses people find for our data. It will
be the same with a routing engine that can be used for quality checking
- people would not be limited to the two things that you can currently
think of; people would find their own uses.
Bye
Frederik
More information about the Strategic
mailing list