[Tagging] bicycle=no

Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxford at googlemail.com
Thu Dec 3 16:41:13 GMT 2009

Access=private means that the rules are uncertain - so don't bank on being
able to even push a bike.


On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM, James Livingston <doctau at mac.com> wrote:
> >> So there is a distinction, but it can probably be achieved by using
> bicycle=no for situations where riding is not allowed, and
> access=private+foot=permissive for situations where bicycles aren't allowed.
> >
> > That sounds reasonable to me. If everyone like that, is it worth putting
> on the 'access' wiki page as an example for how to tag something not
> completely obvious?
> >
> I don't understand what access=private is doing here. "private" is
> about the owner and the public access or not, it has nothing to do
> with pedestrians or bikers.
> Definition on the wiki:
> access=private The owner may give permission on an individual basis.
> Pieren
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20091203/7889cca3/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list