[Tagging] More cycleway=* values needed

Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com
Mon Dec 7 15:16:28 GMT 2009


On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Richard Mann
> >
> > I'm tending towards cycleway=lane+segregated=kerb (or cycleway=track if
> it's
> > two-way)
> >
>
> Not sure that cycleway=lane is best here since the cycleway is not
> part of the car road. There is a real physical separation (the kerb or
> curb) and even car parks between the car traffic and the bicycles.
> This would better fit the cycleway=track definition beside the one or
> two-way, imho.
>
>
Yeah, but it's really just an enhanced bike lane - a path for bikes that
closely follows the road. To me, the "follows the road" is the crucial
distinction, so it's a kind of cycleway=lane, possibly with another tag.

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20091208/d97f2086/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list