[Tagging] A first step towards bringing the wiki and tool support closer together
Craig Wallace
craigw84 at fastmail.fm
Wed Dec 9 03:02:56 GMT 2009
On 09/12/2009 01:27, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com
> <mailto:waldo000000 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I don't see how this is beneficial. As others have said, it just
> encourages tagging for the *current implementation of* the renderer,
> as opposed to tagging with a long-term view.
>
>
> Ok, can someone point me to the policy that says "don't tag for the
> renderer"? I can't find it. It keeps being quoted like a fundamental
> axiom.
>
See these pages:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
As that page says, its probably more acurrate to say "Don't deliberately
tag incorrectly for the renderer".
Craig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20091209/8508448f/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list