[Tagging] More cycleway=* values needed

Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 03:18:34 GMT 2009


On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Richard Mann <
richard.mann.westoxford at googlemail.com> wrote:

> While we're about it, there's a few other potential values for cycleway
> (for interest mainly):
>
> cycleway=buslane (shared with buses)
>

Has potential.


> cycleway=filterlane (explicitly shared with nearside-turning traffic)
>

Has potential.


> cycleway=tight (nearside lane is shared with traffic and is <3.1m wide
>

Two descriptive. Sounds awfully much like "cycleway=no" to me.


> cycleway=spacious (nearside lane is shared with traffic and is >3.7m wide,
> more if typical traffic speed is faster than 40kph)
>

There's something here. If you look at:

http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-37.859974,145.16891&z=21&t=k

This is Springvale Rd, in Melbourne's eastern suburbs. I'm told that that
left lane (on the northbound side) is deliberately wider to cater for
cyclists. It's not really a bike lane, but there is some benefit for
cyclists there.



> cycleway=critical (nearside lane is shared with traffic and between tight
> and spacious)
>

Nah.

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20091209/42158522/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list