[Tagging] Tagging highway=cycleway without explicit knowledge of the law?
davefox at madasafish.com
Fri Dec 18 14:17:50 GMT 2009
Richard Mann wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com
> <mailto:andreengels at gmail.com>> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com
> <mailto:davefox at madasafish.com>> wrote:
> >> In other words, whenever I see a path somewhere, I should say
> >> about who it is for? Just let the user of the map or the builder of
> >> the mapping software decide? That may be pure, it is not practical.
> > That's not what I'm saying, & you know it.
> Oh, now you know what I know better than I do? I HAVE HAD IT WITH
> YOU! GOODBY
> Dave - you seem to be in the "there isn't a problem" camp.
Sorry Richard, but I think there is something wrong - people making it
up as they go along.
Some think it's acceptable to tag something, say, as a cycleway just
because they think it is, when it could actually be officially defined
as a non cycling route.
That is clearly wrong.
& just because some refuse to acknowledge that or continue their
argument with "and another thing..." still doesn't make it right.
> Repeating that assertively doesn't make it any more or less true
I wouldn't repeat it if a valid argument against was put forward.
But, as Andre said - goodby(e)
More information about the Tagging