[Tagging] [OSM-talk] tagging Greenways
mikh43 at googlemail.com
Sat Dec 19 08:25:46 GMT 2009
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tagging-bounces at openstreetmap.org
> [mailto:tagging-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Greg Troxel
> Sent: 18 December 2009 13:48
> To: Paul Johnson
> Cc: talk at openstreetmap.org; tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] tagging Greenways
> Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> writes:
> > Sam Vekemans wrote:
> >> Where the only way i know to map it is to use a relation
> and call it
> >> "route=greenway" and dont have it render on the cyclemap.
> Just map the
> >> sections as appropriate.
> > Greenway is the US/Canadianism for "cycleway."
> I don't follow this. I think that in the US a cycleway would
> be called either a "bike path" or "rail trail", depending on origin.
> I would use "greenway" to describe a large linear park that
> might contain a bike path and footpaths, as in
> Using greenway to describe a cycleway seems odd to me,
> although I suspect that the term greenway does not have an
> established meaning, and people think it means whatever the
> local "Foo Greenway" is.
Mike Harris says ... Tentatively ...
I fear that 'Greenway' is one of those words where the English language is a
bit unhelpful. I certainly recognise the US/Canadian definition from my
sojourns there ... But equally I find that here in England it tends to mean
a linear way (rather than park), usually multiuser, usually not a public
right of way, usually created by a local authority to enhance local leisure
/ environmental facilities and usually in an urban or suburban area.
Maybe we should avoid the term ... And thus the considerable ambiguity?
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.716 / Virus Database: 270.14.113/2573 - Release
> Date: 12/18/09 07:35:00
More information about the Tagging