[Tagging] Adding housnumber the lazy way.

Tobias Knerr osm at tobias-knerr.de
Wed Dec 23 00:06:27 GMT 2009

Alan Mintz wrote:
> At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
>> I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have
>> 4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best
>> you can do short of mapping each address individually.
> Except for this pesky line in the wiki page, which is what implies the 
> presence of all housenumbers on an interpolation way:
> "For missing house numbers (e.g. missing "12") two ways need to be drawn 
> (e.g. "1-11" and "13-25")."

Well, that's the very reason for the recent invention of the
addr:inclusion key. By adding this tag with an appropriate value, you
are basically opting out of that accuracy requirement.


Tobias Knerr

More information about the Tagging mailing list