[Tagging] tagging the multipolygon model (was landuse and military)

[sly (sylvain letuffe)]

On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> no, this is not the case. Multipolygon says: the inner part is NOT
> part of the outer polygon. 

I didn't say that ;-) I said : 
"an area representing something inside another area would still be part of a 
multipolygon relation" (I assumed people discussing this with me are familiar 
with the (advanced) multipolygon proposal and have assumed I was talking 
about an "inner" role in this case.)

> let the mappers decide.

So we do agree. My point was to stop or not to stop harrassing mappers that do 
not include inner polygons.
and/or not updating the wiki acordingly, giving the choice, mentionning that 
solution. We could let decide, but give clues about what's for what.


-- 
sly 
Sylvain Letuffe liste at letuffe.org
qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org