[Tagging] tagging the multipolygon model (was landuse and military)

Ben Laenen benlaenen at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 13:16:27 BST 2009


Pieren wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> 
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2009/10/15 Ben Laenen <benlaenen at gmail.com>:
> >> Anthony wrote:
> >> The only way I see we can solve all this is to get a new tag which is
> >> exclusively used for ground cover. Such a tag would then stop having all
> >> ambiguity, and stop all discussions like "is a lake in a wood part of
> >> the wood or not?".
> >
> > +1, I agree.
> 
> If you go back to the archives, you will see that it was the original
> purpose of the key "landuse".

It obviously failed at that completely. The most used tags 
(landuse=residential, industrial, farm, commercial, military, retail...) don't 
give any detail about ground cover. It has become so bad that I don't see a 
way to even try to fix this with the landuse tag. It has to go back to the 
drawing board without thinking about tags that are in use today.

Ben




More information about the Tagging mailing list