[Tagging] Tagging "natural" borders

[Erik G. Burrows]

>> What is the preferred way to handle this dual-purpose way?
>
> In some forms of rendering the boundary is rendered instead of the stream
> and
> the water feature disappears on the map.
> The preferred Australian solution is to not reuse the same boundary but to
> duplicate it. This allows all renderers and routers to manage the mapping,
> and
> sets off warnings in the duplicate nodes systems which makes some mappers
> then
> merge the ways again.

"Australian solution"? I'd like to think we're not applying different
mapping rules to different countries!

-- 
If you are flammable and have legs, you're never blocking a fire exit.
-Mitch Hedberg