[Tagging] Shoulder and traffic indicator tags

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Wed Aug 18 23:39:46 BST 2010


On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:40:13 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Anthony
> <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Paul Johnson
>> <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>>> The way I've been handling this is to stretch the limits of the
>>> bicycle=destination tag; if it's more major than residential, open to
>>> bicycles, but lacks shoulders and has narrow lanes or on-street
>>> parking, then I tag it bicycle=destination (unless it qualifies for
>>> cycleway=lane).
>>
>> Please don't do that.
> 
> Agreed. *=destination means local traffic only; I've removed the tag.

Please stop doing that.  While the cycle network is not fully mapped in 
the area, impeding it's progress by reverting routes that are local only 
because there is an immediately adjacent cycleway or bicycle boulevard 
under Oregon law ORS 814.420 is not helpful or necessary.  As the Data 
Working Group pointed out, it's also extremely poor form to revert work 
done by people who actually know the area, especially when the person 
doing the reverting has never even set foot in said area (as evidenced by 
your lack of GPX tracks).

Feel free to hire a lawyer who has passed the Oregon bar if you want to 
try to continue down this path; otherwise you're simply vandalizing the 
map and discouraging anyone local from editing.  Stick to what you 
actually know.




More information about the Tagging mailing list