[Tagging] Shoulder and traffic indicator tags

[Nathan Edgars II]

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:40:13 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Anthony
>> <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Paul Johnson
>>> <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>>>> The way I've been handling this is to stretch the limits of the
>>>> bicycle=destination tag; if it's more major than residential, open to
>>>> bicycles, but lacks shoulders and has narrow lanes or on-street
>>>> parking, then I tag it bicycle=destination (unless it qualifies for
>>>> cycleway=lane).
>>>
>>> Please don't do that.
>>
>> Agreed. *=destination means local traffic only; I've removed the tag.
>
> Please stop doing that.  While the cycle network is not fully mapped in
> the area, impeding it's progress by reverting routes that are local only
> because there is an immediately adjacent cycleway or bicycle boulevard
> under Oregon law ORS 814.420 is not helpful or necessary.

There's no such thing as an "immediately adjacent" bicycle boulevard;
there's going to be at least one block between.