osm at inbox.org
Fri Aug 27 14:45:57 BST 2010
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>> It may be legal to walk on private property next to a road at least
>> when a car's approaching (I don't really know, what if there's a "no
>> trespassing" sign?). But it's not always even possible to do so.
> Roads are designed with a public "clear zone" next to the pavement
> (main driving surface). This area is always available for walking
> unless pedestrians are not allowed on the road at all.
All roads in the world were designed this way? Do you have a citation for that?
> Do you have an example of a road where you don't think walking on the
> grass is legal but walking on the road is?
Not off the top of my head, no. Why does it matter? I have plenty of
examples where there is no grass.
Also, this situation comes to mind (I think this is the address,
though I can't find the exact sign I was thinking of) where there was
no sidewalk and a "no trespassing" sign. But I suspect that wasn't
More information about the Tagging