[Tagging] Relation for saying "x is attached to y"?

Phil! Gold phil_g at pobox.com
Mon Aug 30 16:46:40 BST 2010

* M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> [2010-08-30 17:40 +0200]:
> 2010/8/30 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> >> - "these objects express the same thing as that object but in more
> >> detail" (eg, one line representing a pair or more of train lines)
> in this actual example you don't need relations but can do as with
> streets (lanes-tag). I'm not sure on the best syntax though: should it
> be tracks=4 or lanes=4? The latter is less correct regarding the
> language but doesn't require additional tags.

There is a proposal for a tracks= tag:


...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/
PGP: 026A27F2  print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248  9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2
--- --
Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
                       -- Edward Everett
---- --- --

More information about the Tagging mailing list