dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Aug 31 08:53:01 BST 2010
2010/8/31 Anthony <osm at inbox.org>:
> Huh? You realize this is the same location as your aerial, right?
> The aerial which you said showed no footway, and the google street
> view which you say does have the same lat/lon.
yes, you can see that arthur st/wastell ct. in the east has an
informal footway (the one of the link I modified from yours), in the
west it hasn't. You can also see it on the nearmap aerial (even though
it is a bit hard to see it because it "hides" in the shaddow).
More information about the Tagging