[Tagging] Race track
deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 1 01:26:18 GMT 2010
On 1 February 2010 06:26, Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:13 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ... Obviously if
>> someone wants to spend a lot of time areas would be more accurate, but
>> in that case it might as well be left as a raster image.
> No, because with a raster image, you can't:
> 1) route to/from an object within the image
> 2) calculate the area of an object within the image
> 3) calculate the centerline of an object within the image
> 4) TAG AN OBJECT within a raster image (as it has no boundaries).
> etc etc etc.
Of course not, but you can use vector objects to describe information
in the raster ones, similar to what Nearmap.com does on their website
More information about the Tagging