[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Narrow width

John Smith deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Thu Feb 18 15:04:00 GMT 2010

On 18 February 2010 22:30, Kim Slotte <kim.slotte at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> == Proposal ==
> It is important to define "narrow" for highways residential,
> unclassified and living_street. Tag {{tag|width|narrow}} is not yet
> defined at [[Key:width]]. The alternatives are <=3.5m, <=3m, <=2.5m and
> <=2m. It is also important to know the width limit for when narrow
> rendering should be done.

Just estimate the width, width:est=*

Narrow is too subjective where as width:est isn't much better but at
least it puts a number to it and the rendering software can decide on
it's own if it's narrow enough to render differently.

More information about the Tagging mailing list