[Tagging] Proposed definition for cycleways

Nop ekkehart at gmx.de
Wed Jan 6 13:06:19 GMT 2010


Am 06.01.2010 13:00, schrieb Steve Bennett:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com
> Ok, so having created an entry for Australia
> (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Australia),
> now does the above rule apply? That is, in Australia, according to the
> rules I've written, is "highway=path, bicycle=designated,
> foot=designated" equivalent to "highway=cycleway"?

No, with 2xdesignated the way is equally dedicated to foot+bike.

With cycleway it is mainly for bike with foot tolerated, so cycleway is 
the equivalent of bike=designated, foot=yes.

But anyhow, it seems the monthly foot/bike/path discussion is on. So I'd 
invite you to check the point of views and discussions of previous 
instances and maybe contribute some to the summary page.



More information about the Tagging mailing list