[Tagging] Race track
waldo000000 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 31 20:26:31 GMT 2010
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:13 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:
> ... Obviously if
> someone wants to spend a lot of time areas would be more accurate, but
> in that case it might as well be left as a raster image.
No, because with a raster image, you can't:
1) route to/from an object within the image
2) calculate the area of an object within the image
3) calculate the centerline of an object within the image
4) TAG AN OBJECT within a raster image (as it has no boundaries).
etc etc etc.
More information about the Tagging