On 16 July 2010 11:19, Bill Ricker <bill.n1vux at gmail.com> wrote: > It should be mapped, but not in the core OSM.org planet file / db. Depends how semi-perm it becomes, if it isn't cleaned up in a reasonable time frame, like the spill in Alaska hasn't been, then I don't see any reason why it can't be added into the OSM DB...