[Tagging] paved=yes/no

Richard Welty rwelty at averillpark.net
Mon Jul 19 12:13:08 BST 2010

On 7/19/10 2:55 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Richard Welty<rwelty at averillpark.net>  wrote:
>> i might add that if we're looking at the introduction of new semantics in
>> order
>> to make adding unpaved=yes/no ok, it's going to take a great deal to
>> convince
>> me.
> It's not "adding" new semantics, it's *articulating* the semantics
> that probably exist anyway.
no, they don't exist. no one has apparently considered the issue before.
we need to be asking ourselves:

1) are these semantics useful enough to add?

2) what are the implications of adding them? (they will directly
impact rendering engines and other consumers of data.)


More information about the Tagging mailing list