[Tagging] paved=yes/no

[M∡rtin Koppenhoefer]

2010/7/19 John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>:
> On 19 July 2010 23:47, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> No, I didn't miss that. I was replying to Pieren in the cited message.
>> You're right, it is not impossible, still it requires a bit of effort
>> due to the number of surface values.
>
> There is only a limited number of values that would be considered paved...


OK, I'm fine with eliminating Key:paved and redirect to the surface
page. I added to the surface description  that it is preferred to be
more explicit than just paved/unpaved if possible.

cheers,
Martin