[Tagging] highway=motorway and motorroad (implies)

[fly]

Am 10.06.2010 15:23, schrieb Pieren:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:51 PM, fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com
> <mailto:lowflight66 at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     1. I know some motorways which are not oneway.
> 
> 
> not in Europe

yes, in Germany. If the Road is in/under cronstuction and also some ends of
motorways. They are sign as motorways but the only have one lane and some have
no physical barrier in between.

This situation can sometimes last for years.

>     2. Right now your are not allowed to ride with a motorcycle on
>     motorways, as
>     long as it is not tagged seperatly !
> 
> 
> why ?

If access=no is implied, you need motorcycle=yes, cause right no only
motorcar=yes is implied. Better would be to imply motor_vehicle=yes

> 
>     3. Maybe your are allowed to use a  motorways by foot or bicycle ?
> 
> 
> It was said here that some motorways allow bicycle in US. But nowhere
> else. Does it mean that for 3 highways which require a bicycle=yes in
> US, we have to add bicycle=no to thousands others worldwide ?


I am not against implying tags, but you have to be careful, and they have to be
worked over, sometimes.

Maybe we should imply access=motor_vehicle,  mofas=no, moped=no, instead of
access=no, motorcars=yes, hgv=yes
or just use motorroad=yes

from your suggestion lanes=2 should be implied aswell.


We also need to point out regional differences better than it is down so far !

cu
colliar