[Tagging] What classification for a connecting link?

[Richard Mann]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The simplest is probably to call the fourth
>> a trunk with a note that there's a case for it being a trunk_link, but
>> that trunk is more renderer-proof.
>
> That seems incorrect, and hence tagging (incorrectly) for the
> renderer. Whether something is a link should not depend on how links
> are rendered.
>

Call them two-way links, if you prefer. I may get round to filing a
trac ticket to request they are rendered better in Mapnik.

Richard