[Tagging] land cover/surface=* tagging Re: Landuse border alignment
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sat May 15 04:37:25 BST 2010
2010/5/15 John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>:
> On 15 May 2010 11:30, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> yes, we should. Most of them are already present in "nature".
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
the thing is: the amount of different values makes it already hard to
actually use these e.g. in bicycle-routing (there is x types of paving
stones, ...). When this started there were only 2-3 values: paved,
unpaved and cobblestone. Untill now there are 22 different values. If
we add another 100 landscape-surface values, and people add those to
highways, it will be even harder.
the ones usually used for non-highways are these (probably to be extended):
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Natural
cheers,
Martin
More information about the Tagging
mailing list