[Tagging] Landuse border alignment
Seventy 7
seventy7 at operamail.com
Mon May 17 14:14:51 BST 2010
Personally I'm starting to use multipolygons more and more - define a
"boundary" once and reuse is as many times as needed by the landuses
either side.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: Pieren
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Landuse border alignment
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:51:15 +0200
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Jonas Minnberg <sasq64 at gmail.com>
wrote:
I'm kind of considering if this is right or not - if a road is
the divider between two landuses, is it still best to unglue it
from the landuse(s) and move it into one or the other?
It's best to unglue but it's also not wrong to glue the landuse. Some
will say it's inaccurate, but hey, drawing a road with a polyline is
also inaccurate.
In some cases, ungluing can be worst : imagine two parallel streets
and one pedestrian square in between. If you unglue the square, you
need polylines to represent the roads connection (for e.g. pedestrian
routing). These lines are inacurate because they can be drawn at some
intervals only where physically the connection is everywhere along
the square. If you glue the pedestrian square, your problem is easily
solved and closer to the reality.
Pieren
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
_______________________________________________
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20100517/05506082/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list