[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Garden specification)

"Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" xificurk at gmail.com
Wed May 19 11:26:52 BST 2010


Jonathan Bennett napsal(a):
> On 18/05/2010 21:56, "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" wrote:
>> maybe even landuse=allotments if anyone wants to tag each property
>> separately.
> 
> Nope. That would be allotment=plot or something. Each plot is not a
> separate garden, but just the parcel of land allocated to a tenant.

Yeah, that makes sense... I wasn't sure about this one.


M∡rtin Koppenhoefer napsal(a):
>>>> I think leisure=garden should be located exclusively in
>>>> > landuse=recreation_ground, or residential (for garden:type=residential),
>>>> > maybe even landuse=allotments if anyone wants to tag each property
>>>> > separately.
>>> ? No, it is useful for castles and other representational gardens as
>>> well. Why would you restrict it to residencial areas? I mean, at least
>>> that would be quite a change from the current definition.

landuse=recreation_ground OR landuse=residential - do you know any
garden that is outside those two areas?

Regards,
Petr Morávek

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20100519/fe3b2ffe/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Tagging mailing list