[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Garden specification)

["Petr Morávek [Xificurk]"]

M∡rtin Koppenhoefer napsal(a):
>> landuse=recreation_ground OR landuse=residential - do you know any
>> garden that is outside those two areas?
> 
> IMHO all castle gardens, as I wrote above.
> this one probably is inside "recreation_ground"
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.547484&lon=13.387484&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF
> this one
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.52396&lon=13.29648&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
> 
> of course, if you declare that every garden is a recreation_ground it
> will be the case, but IMHO the recreation_ground definition somehow
> excludes gardens:
> "An open green space for general recreation, which may include
> pitches, nets and so on, usually municipal but possibly also private
> to colleges or companies. "

I see your point... I think the wiki definition of
landuse=recreation_ground is a bit in conflict with common sense (like
the leisure=garden was) and it should be changed.
I would say the land where are gardens, parks, zoos, sport centres, ...
is used for recreation, so it should be tagged landuse=recreation_ground.

Regards,
Petr Morávek

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20100519/bc329fdd/attachment.pgp>