[Tagging] FW: FW: Parking for businesses..

[Tyler Gunn]

> Rather than permitted=*, why not use parking_use=*? That would then be
> consistent with your proposed relation. Though "permitted" is more
> general and might be able to be generalised to other features...

Or perhaps something like "permitted_parkers"; I don't think there's
anything wrong with a somewhat specific tag like that.  It'll prevent
ambiguity in the future such as what we're trying to resolve here with the
"access" one.  :)
 
> I suggested a similar solution a couple of days ago:
> "Alternatively, for parking, use the key "use" (as a noun) instead of
> [or in addition to] access, as in use=public/customer/private." 
> There are then a few options for defining the values of parking_use,
> e.g. my public/customer/private or your patron/staff/permit_holder, or
> some combination thereof...

Ooops, yes, you did.  Great idea! :)  So many emails, so little time.

Agreed; similar words to mean similar things.  I opted for patron rather
than customer so that it was a little more generic; it sounds a little
funny to say patient parking for a doctor is "customer parking".  :) 
Patron is a little more generic I think.  

Tyler