[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Orphanage

[John Smith]

On 28 May 2010 01:10, Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/5/27 yarl at o2.pl <yarl at o2.pl>
>>
>> 2010/5/27 John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>:
>> > In fact there is so many amenities we should perhaps think about
>> > splitting them off into other categories...
>>
>> Sounds like a good idea.
>>
>
> No. The amount of values should not influence the key. The question is more
> to know if we can consider 'orphanage' as an 'amenity' like schools,
> hospitals, nusing homes, etc. I think it's correct here.

And that's my point, amenity is used too widely, why can't we come up
with their own category, like
public_services=hospital|school|nursing_home etc etc etc

To me a hospital isn't an amenity, a public toilet is an amenity.