[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic jam warning

[Roy Wallace]

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Would be nice if someone comes up with a way to make this tag more
> verifiable, but if there's no better way to get this information into
> the database, than "unverifiable" info is still better than no info at all.

Agreed. One way to make it more verifiable is to avoid using a broad,
complex description (e.g. "if A or B and usually C...") for a single
tag (jam=yes).
Instead, as I suggested before, clarify what you mean in the tag
itself, e.g. traffic_jam:expected:daily=yes, or
traffic_jam:warning_sign=yes, or traffic_jam:average_delay=10min.

As a mapper I would find those tags MUCH easier to read and easier to
verify than "jam=yes".