[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpool

M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sun Nov 14 11:34:57 GMT 2010

2010/11/14 Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:08 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2010/11/13 John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>:
>>> On 13 November 2010 21:38, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> access no is completely wrong IMHO, better might be access=private,
>>>> which also might be wrong, as the access might be allowed, but not to
>>>> park there.
>>> access=destination ?
>> My point was that access is about the accessibility while here it
>> might be needed a tag to indicate who is allowed to park.
> We use access=private for private parking lots, do we not?

Maybe not a good idea.


More information about the Tagging mailing list