[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpool

john at jfeldredge.com john at jfeldredge.com
Sun Nov 14 19:33:44 GMT 2010

If, however, a parking lot were to be restricted for car-pooling use only, it would be reasonable to tag it as access=carpool or access=carpooling.

-------Original Email-------
Subject :Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Carpool
From  :mailto:rodolphe at quiedeville.org
Date  :Sun Nov 14 08:35:02 America/Chicago 2010

Le 14/11/2010 12:15, Nathan Edgars II a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:08 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2010/11/13 John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>:
>>> On 13 November 2010 21:38, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> access no is completely wrong IMHO, better might be access=private,
>>>> which also might be wrong, as the access might be allowed, but not to
>>>> park there.
>>> access=destination ?
>> My point was that access is about the accessibility while here it
>> might be needed a tag to indicate who is allowed to park.
> We use access=private for private parking lots, do we not?

No parking where you can do carpooling are not private, you can park
without doing carpooling too.


Rodolphe Quiédeville - Artisan Logiciel Libre
Travailleur indépendant spécialisé en logiciel libre
SIP/XMPP : rodolphe at quiedeville.org

Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

More information about the Tagging mailing list