[Tagging] geology taggin?
ulf.lamping at googlemail.com
Tue Nov 16 03:48:28 GMT 2010
Am 16.11.2010 03:49, schrieb "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]":
> The problem with surface is that it is currently proposed (and used) to
> describe two different things:
> 1) A property of certain object, which can be area, way, node...
> 2) What is on the surface of certain _area_ of land ("landcover").
> Although there is currently no big overlap between usage (1) and (2) on
> areas, I think it would be better to differentiate these two use cases,
> so one can easily e.g. filter out and render only landcover map.
So what is the *exact* problem with surface?
> Another advantage of specialized tag "landcover" is that in contrast
> with surface it by itself implies area=yes.
So what is the *exact* advantage of landcover?
Sorry, this kind of vague "we might want to have xy because someone
might want to ..." is pretty much pointless.
More information about the Tagging