[Tagging] geology taggin?

Ulf Lamping ulf.lamping at googlemail.com
Tue Nov 16 03:48:28 GMT 2010

Am 16.11.2010 03:49, schrieb "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]":
> The problem with surface is that it is currently proposed (and used) to
> describe two different things:
> 1) A property of certain object, which can be area, way, node...
> 2) What is on the surface of certain _area_ of land ("landcover").
> Although there is currently no big overlap between usage (1) and (2) on
> areas, I think it would be better to differentiate these two use cases,
> so one can easily e.g. filter out and render only landcover map.

So what is the *exact* problem with surface?

> Another advantage of specialized tag "landcover" is that in contrast
> with surface it by itself implies area=yes.

So what is the *exact* advantage of landcover?

Sorry, this kind of vague "we might want to have xy because someone 
might want to ..." is pretty much pointless.

Regards, ULFL

More information about the Tagging mailing list