[Tagging] emergency=fire_hydrant

[Ulf Lamping]

Am 19.10.2010 02:53, schrieb Richard Welty:
> On 10/18/10 8:40 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>>
>> There has been a very lengthy discussion about the emergency category
>> - and there wasn't a clear outcome. There wasn't a consensus if the
>> change is useful at all and it's still unclear what should be in the
>> emergency category and what not.
> it looked pretty non-controversial

There wasn't even a consensus in the "pro-change" fraction what 
qualifies as an emergency and what not.

> until a small number of people
> started arguing loudly against it.

I've counted 8 individuals that argued against the change at about 20 
(not counted them) total participants. Doesn't look like a "small 
number" to me.

Regards, ULFL