[Tagging] Paper streets?
Anthony
osm at inbox.org
Tue Oct 19 18:12:59 BST 2010
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Luckily you're not the final judge of what's appropriate.
In this case that's actually unfortunate.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
>>>> For a right of way designated in the plats (which, if it's in the
>>>> plats it shouldn't be built on, right?), maybe something like
>>>> landuse=right_of_way, or landuse=paper_street.
>>>
>>> That requires drawing it as an area rather than a single line.
>>
>> No, you can put any tags you want on any elements you want.
>
> So how would you draw a paper street that forms a circle?
I'm not sure that I ever would "draw a paper street". I don't see the
point of it (*).
But if you're asking how to map a closed way in OSM, and designate
that it is not an area (when using a tag which can be used for both
areas and non-areas and defaults to area=yes), that would be area=no.
(*) Maybe for "a confusing situation where a street appeared on Google
Maps, but not on OSM", I might draw the street and not put any tags on
it except maybe "note=appears in Google Maps but doesn't actually
exist". Though even then, probably not, because someone might claim
that infringes on the Google Maps TOS.
More information about the Tagging
mailing list