[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - social facility

Peter Wendorff wendorff at uni-paderborn.de
Fri Oct 22 08:52:00 BST 2010


  Hi.
I think, that's a good point.
As social_facility has a relatively widespread meaning across the 
entities it is used for, I think, it's useless to filter the data for 
amenity=social_facility, because nobody will use that not filtered or 
sorted further.
It's similar simple to filter for social_facility=*, and therefore that 
should be enough. social_facility is not ambiguous conflicting with 
other *=social_facility for interpretation as a subtag.

That in mind: +1 from me for optional amenity=social_facility

regards
Peter

On 21.10.2010 23:27, Sean Horgan wrote:
> Hello again everyone.
>
> The last day of voting for the Social Facility proposal is tomorrow, 
> 22 Oct.  The proposal can be found on the wiki here:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/social_facility
>
> With 13 votes, 12 for and 1 against, it looks like we are 2 votes away 
> from the community recommended 15 for approval.
>
> User Hasemann raised a good point concerning the use of 
> amenity=social_facility.  Personally, I'm fine with making the use of 
> amenity an optional but recommended tag instead of required.  Would 
> such a change to the proposal change anyone's votes?  What is the 
> recommended process for making changes to an approved feature?
>
> I'm going to send out a separate email on the amenity issue.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sean
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 08:35, Sean Horgan <seanhorgan at gmail.com 
> <mailto:seanhorgan at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Ok, sounds good.  I just bumped the date to the end of next week.
>
>
>     On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 05:55, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
>     <dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         2010/10/10 Sean Horgan <seanhorgan at gmail.com
>         <mailto:seanhorgan at gmail.com>>:
>         > Hello everyone!
>         > The original deadline for voting on the social facility
>         proposal has just
>         > passed.  The page can be found here:
>         >
>         http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/social_facility
>         > We received 4 approvals (2 of those from the authors) and 1
>         in opposition.
>         >  We've tried to address concerns in the Discussion page and
>         we've updated
>         > the proposal based on feedback from email.
>         > Based on the proposed feature process
>         >
>         (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features#Proposal_status_process),
>         > we should aim for 15 total votes.  Could people on this list
>         take a few
>         > minutes to either cast their vote or note their objections?
>         > Thanks to everyone for their help to this point.
>
>
>         I would set a new deadline on the Wiki (say +14 days), to make
>         it clearer.
>
>         cheers,
>         Martin
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Tagging mailing list
>         Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>         http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20101022/e7737bf3/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list