[Tagging] Reasons for associatedStreet?

[David Paleino]

On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:42:12 +0200, Simone Saviolo wrote:

> 2010/9/1 David Paleino <dapal at debian.org>:
> > In fact, we already have a relation for grouping a street together (various
> > segments + "links"). That's Relation:route, with route=road. What about a
> > "house" role to include housenumbers there?
> 
> I'm not sure if you're suggesting we use the proposed relation Street
> (that already has a "house" role) or the approved relation Route.

I'm proposing the use of the already well-established Route.

Ciao,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20100901/44c691a3/attachment.pgp>