[Tagging] Using route=road to group the segments of a street (was: Re: Reasons for associatedStreet?)
David Paleino
dapal at debian.org
Wed Sep 1 10:50:03 BST 2010
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 05:26:26 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:19 AM, David Paleino
> <dapal at debian.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 05:09:22 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> >> Why is a route relation needed to group the segments of a street?
> >
> > I'm using that because I consider "Foo Avenue" as a logical unit, a
> > "route", even if the way is split (because of oneways, different
> > classifications, different tags, whatever).
>
> But why does this "logical unit" need to be grouped in a relation? I
> don't see any benefit to it.
The benefit is intrinsic in data organization.
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20100901/221345cb/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list