[Tagging] tagging single trees

[NopMap]

M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 
> 2010/9/6 NopMap <ekkehart at gmx.de>:
>> The definition has been unchanged since 2006. The tag has been used
>> 372,969
>> times (tagstat).
> 
> Are you seriously pretending that all those are mapped according to
> your interpretation of the wiki? My guess is that the ones you would
> think that fit into this definition are less then 1%.
> 
> 

No. I say that we don't know how many of them have been used that way - but
I have been building and using a hiking map for 1,5 years now, rendering and
observing those tree tags, and I know that a large number has been used
properly. Taking into account that the wiki definition has stood for 4
years, you'd think it has seen some use. I would think that maybe 20% of the
nodes are significant landmark trees.

So even if your assumtion is correct, 1% means throwing away 3729
well-tagged nodes, in my expectation it would be throwing away some 75000
good nodes.

I am always opposed to needlessly destroying the work of those mappers.

bye
           Nop

-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/tagging-single-trees-tp5501462p5502679.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.