[Tagging] tagging single trees

[Richard Welty]

  On 9/6/10 2:55 PM, NopMap wrote:
> That is not a solution. For 4 years people have done valid tagging, using
> the definition in the wiki for significant trees. If you change the meaning,
> no denotation=landmark will magically appear there, so the information gets
> lost. The mappers who originally contributed them have no idea that you
> changed the meaning on them, so nothing will happen to fix the damage.
>
>
i think the situation is that the information is already lost.

richard