[Tagging] tagging single trees

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Tue Sep 7 16:30:36 BST 2010


On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:27 AM, NopMap <ekkehart at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>
> Anthony-6 wrote:
>>
>> Where does the 58,000 number come from again?
>>
>
> If you scale up the result of the German analysis to the global numbers,
> you'd get about 59000 individial trees that are intended as landmark trees
> according to the wiki definition and would loose their meaning if the
> definition is changed.

Can't that analysis be expanded to the world, and the trees retagged?



More information about the Tagging mailing list