[Tagging] Non proposed features

[Matthias Meißer]

Nice aspects Pieren,

I agree your point of view concerning votes and how decissions were 
taken by (a smal part of) the community.

Ok so your idea seem to be very familar to this idea 'garage'/incubator 
with the aim to discuss an feature idea more to vote on it?

Yes voting is not represantative cause only a very small subset of 
active mappers are interested in creating new features and out of this 
ones again there are a hand full that are interested in voting/improving 
a proposal.

So we want to change over to a more non vote but keeping the RFC like 
draft discussion approach?

But how do we deal with the map features list, should they be managed? 
Managed by who? Managed by which guidelines?

regards
Matthias