[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

[André Riedel]

2010/9/6 Tom Chance <tom at acrewoods.net>:
> If you can do so without requiring that mappers happy with
> generator:method=gasification be forced to instead enter a more complicated
> mixture of tags to describe those precise processes, then I wouldn't argue
> against your proposal. It wouldn't interest me, but it also wouldn't get in
> my way.

We do not need a tag with
generator:method=gasifcation-of-biomass-for-combustion-and-heating-water-to-power-a-steam-turbine.
All we need is a better categorizing of these values. This could be
done in the definition table. But you have to define it somewhere.

The same with 'fission'. If you define it as 'heating water to power a
steam turbine', all other methods could be named with
'fission:betavoltaics' or 'fission:mhd'.

But all these values of 'generator:method' works only very well for
these combustion or fission generators. :-( All water based generators
include their method in its 'generator:source'.

Ciao André