[Tagging] tagging single trees
Anthony
osm at inbox.org
Fri Sep 10 22:16:33 BST 2010
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 5:00 PM, NopMap <ekkehart at gmx.de> wrote:
> I did what was asked for. You can't mark landmarks automatically, but can
> add a hint to those that are likely unremarkable. Since it is just an
> additional tag, it is non-destructive, unlike re-inventing the tagging
> scheme. If you don't like it, just ignore it.
>
> This being OSM, surely there would be complaints. It is very funny that they
> even come from one of the very people who suggested it in the first place.
> :-)
Umm, first of all, you did the opposite of what was suggested.
Secondly, my suggestion was mainly sarcastic.
Thirdly, I'm not complaining. I find this whole thing rather humorous.
More information about the Tagging
mailing list