[Tagging] tagging single trees

[Anthony]

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 5:00 PM, NopMap <ekkehart at gmx.de> wrote:
> I did what was asked for. You can't mark landmarks automatically, but can
> add a hint to those that are likely unremarkable. Since it is just an
> additional tag, it is non-destructive, unlike re-inventing the tagging
> scheme. If you don't like it, just ignore it.
>
> This being OSM, surely there would be complaints. It is very funny that they
> even come from one of the very people who suggested it in the first place.
> :-)

Umm, first of all, you did the opposite of what was suggested.

Secondly, my suggestion was mainly sarcastic.

Thirdly, I'm not complaining.  I find this whole thing rather humorous.